Ask Dave Taylor
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Most Popular
  • Top Categories
  • Books
  • About Dave
  • Ask Me
  • > Donate <
  • Home
  • SEO & Marketing
  • What’s Acceptable Search Engine “Spam” Technique?

What’s Acceptable Search Engine “Spam” Technique?

August 10, 2004 / Dave Taylor / SEO & Marketing / 1 Comment

After hearing a lot about it, I went over to SitePoint and read an interesting article by a “search engine optimization expert” wherein he enumerates his list of fifteen of the most egregious techniques by which companies and individuals “spam” the search engines. What’s search engine spam, you ask? It’s using inappropriate and deceitful methods of manipulating the HTML or other elements of a site to generate a higher ranking than the site would otherwise be granted by a typical search engine relevance calculation.

Now don’t get me wrong, I absolutely am against search engine spamming and other forms of ‘cheating’, so it’s not that I don’t agree with the premise of the article at all. What I have a problem with is more about whether the technologies and techniques that are singled out are really search engines spamming or not.
Wikis
For example, Wikis are singled out as a bad technology, yet a Wiki is just a minimalist shared white board, a technology that lets a group of people share the maintenance of Web-based content. The most popular is probably Wikipedia, which is a fabulous resource, but even Net-savvy publisher O’Reilly has a Wiki that they use to manage the interaction between the company, their authors, and user groups.
The argument of the article author, though, is that Wiki’s are dangerous because anyone can — theoretically — add content and therefore add bogus links back to a third-party site. Are Wiki’s therefore bad because people can “spam” them? Of course not.
Just like comments on a weblog or entries in a guestbook, pages on a Wiki should be monitored to ensure that the information thereon is relevant.
Networked Blogs
Another area of complaint: so-called “networked blogs”. Again, the article’s author arbitrarily decides what is and isn’t legitimate content, stating: “some spammers start a blog, plug it full of garbage content such as comments on what they thought at 5:15, along with a link or two and some keyword rich text.”
There are undoubtedly some people who exploit that idea, but I am far more reticent about deciding that a weblog where they talk about what they were thinking at a given time is garbage. As a quick example, perhaps the 5:15pm thoughts were interesting because the weblog writer had just gotten off work and knew that something frightening (or wonderful) was going to happen at 5:50.
Writing weblog entries or articles in a manner that allows certain keywords or key phrases to be repeated with some frequency seems like more of a smart way to ensure that your musings are rated as relevant with a search engine than otherwise. After all, in typical prose you might mention the subject of the comment once, then just refer to “it” and “the problem”, “the company” or similar, making it impossible for a search engine to know what is the subject of the article in the first place. (and that’s a good argument as to why you should also craft good titles for your entries too)
Who Makes the Judgment Call?
What bothers me about these two techniques that are highlighted is that we’re sliding from the overt spam techniques cogently discussed in the Sitepoint article (techniques including invisible text and link farms, both discussed in detail in Three Ways to Adversely Impact your Google Pagerank) to techniques that are really more of a judgment call. I imagine that the author of the original article, for example, would find a comment added to this weblog entry that pointed to someone else’s site offering ten smart ways to improve your search ranking to be spam, even though I wouldn’t necessarily agree.
What I’m trying to say here is that I’m in agreement when we’re talking about objective search engine spam techniques, but when we move into subjective search engine spam techniques, I’m a lot less comfortable with the entire topic and am confident that what I think is SES is going to be different to what you, the reader, would think is SES.
So my closing thought on this topic is that it’s always important to take what anyone says about search engine optimization — including what I say — with a grain of salt. Think for yourself, read the published criteria from important search engine sites like Google, and make your own decisions on how to approach the problem and what kind of results you seek.
The article on Sitepoint: Latest Search Engine Spam Techniques by Gord Collins.

Let’s Stay In Touch!

Never miss a single article, review or tutorial here on AskDaveTaylor, sign up for my fun weekly newsletter!
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries
No spam, ever. Promise. Powered by FeedBlitz
Please choose a color:
Starbucks coffee cup I do have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but first I'd like to say thank you, Dave, for all your helpful information by buying you a cup of coffee!

One comment on “What’s Acceptable Search Engine “Spam” Technique?”

  1. leon says:
    January 22, 2006 at 7:31 am

    Hi, I am in total agreement with you. I don’t think it’s spam if someone writes what they are up to at 5.15am, whether its relevant and interesting to other people or not. Its their blog/ website its really up to them what they choose to discuss. I am in total agreement when we move into “spam” techniques, it is very difficult to classify them as such, as it is really open to peoples interpretation. However one thing I think we have to accept is its google, yahoo and the other big SEs that decide what spam is, as they alone decide which sites to ban or rank.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Recent Posts

  • How Can I Prevent Remote Access to my Windows PC?
  • The Easy Way to Add Contacts to my New Android Phone?
  • How Can I Hide or Report An Offensive Advert on Facebook?
  • Switch “Paste” & “Paste and Match Style” Keyboard Shortcuts on MacOS?
  • How Can I Easily Create a QR Code For My Web Page?

On Our YouTube Channel

AUKEY Omnia 100W + Minima 20W Power Chargers -- DEMO & REVIEW

Roborock S6 MaxV Robot Vacuum Cleaner -- DEMO & REVIEW

Categories

  • AdSense, AdWords, and PPC Help (106)
  • Amazon Echo & Kindle Help (79)
  • Amazon, eBay, and Online Shopping Help, (157)
  • Android Help (160)
  • Apple Watch Help (49)
  • Articles, Tutorials, and Reviews (327)
  • Business Advice (192)
  • Computer & Internet Basics (720)
  • d) None of the Above (160)
  • Facebook Help (365)
  • Google, Chrome & Gmail Help (157)
  • HTML & Web Page Design (244)
  • Instagram Help (44)
  • iPad Help (137)
  • iPhone & iOS Help (571)
  • iPod & MP3 Player Help (173)
  • LinkedIn Help (79)
  • Linux Help (149)
  • Linux Shell Script Programming (86)
  • Mac & MacOS Help (833)
  • Most Popular (10)
  • Outlook & Office 365 Help (10)
  • PayPal Help (68)
  • Pinterest Help (53)
  • Reddit Help (12)
  • SEO & Marketing (80)
  • Spam, Scams & Security (84)
  • Trade Show News & Updates (23)
  • Twitter Help (212)
  • Video Game Tips (66)
  • Web Site Traffic Tips (62)
  • Windows 10 Help (831)
  • Wordpress Help (201)
  • Writing and Publishing (72)
  • YouTube Help (43)
  • YouTube Video Reviews (159)
  • Zoom, Skype & Video Chat Help (42)

Archives

Social Connections:

Ask Dave Taylor


Follow Me on Pinterest
Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on LinkedIn
Follow me on Instagram


AskDaveTaylor on Facebook



microsoft insider mvp


This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this site or on any linked site. Further, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to our terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site. Our lawyer says "Thanks for your cooperation."
© 2020 by Dave Taylor. "Ask Dave Taylor®" is a registered trademark of Intuitive Systems, LLC.
Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Accessibility Policy