Dave. In reference your recent comments on .msi installation (specifically How do I install a .MSI download?). I’ve done some research and find that neither Microsoft nor you don’t WinXP, which is where I’m having a problem. My Dell laptop constantly tells me that msi is required for the application to work properly. I try to load the suggested msi files and I get a message that state my current msi files are more current than what I’m trying to load. Catch-22 MS style. Aside from reloading XP, do you know of a fix?
Without knowing what application you are using, I can’t be very specific in this answer. Remember, if you’re going to submit a question to Ask Dave Taylor, the extra few minutes giving me specific details of your problem and configuration are a great help in debugging or tracking down the solution.
There are some general windows installer issues that could be addressed here, however.
As I recall, the installer program is one of the many things that was updated for SP2. (If you don’t have SP2, it’s probably time for you to get it, but read Safe SP2 Upgrade Tips first).
There is a newer installer program (version 3.1) that was released in mid-April. You can download it from Microsoft’s Web site.
This may take care of some of your problems. I have often had programs tell me to download a newer driver or .dll file, only to find out that the suggested file is older than the one I already have. I tend to ignore these messages. If the message is constantly bugging you, then there may be a way to update the program in question manually. This gives you more control, but you do have to remember to update.
Hope that helps you out!
Hi Dave,
A new problem with my Windows XP (SP3) computer.
I had a Ham Radio program (Logger32) that I have used for years suddenly stop working so I tried a reinstall after deleting it. Ever since the program still does not work (problem with com port control to my radio). But now every time I go to open any other program I get a pop up window labelled: MSRedist
“Please wait while windows configures MSRedist”
Then almost immediately another window pop up over it labelled: Setup
” ! This MSI must be launched through Setup.”
Then I close these windows by Cancelling and the program I want opens up OK.
I tried the fix that tells me to find msredist.msi and delete it, but I cannot find through searching for the hidden msconfig.msi file or folder to delete it. I have folders configured to display hidden files.
Any ideas on what it going on and how to fix?
Thanks
Jeff
Dear Dave:
I have noticed today that my XP Pro SP2 keeps a great number of the *.msi files. I have explored many of them. They “belong” to the programs that have been installed in the past and are working. My conclusion would be “All these *.msi files are no longer needed and can be deleted.” Am I wrong?
Regards,
Wlodek
This is one of those classic examples of someone getting a great deal on a Dell computer. Sadly they have Dell’s version of Windows not Microsoft’s.
Microsoft did more for computer makers with XP than they did for the user in a big way.
Personally XP will never see any machine of mine. I have Win2000 on CD along with all the service packs and it will stay that way for the forseeable future. When the day comes that I can no longer enjoy the features and security if Windows 2000 with existing content I’ll bite the bullet, even though I’m 60, and learn a new OS like Linux or the Mac OS.
Redmond has gotten just to much out of hand in recent times. Even businesses and corporations are leaving the Windows fold. I’ve even given up MS Office in favor of the open source OpenOffice and I’m just as happy with it’s functions. The beauty of it all is OpenOffice is free! Not $400 for a buggy complex software suite that a lot of people are even reverting to earlier versions of if not replacing. Redmond is losing ground in areas other than just the OS market. That’s why there’s so much emphasis on satisfying the OEM’s needs with XP modifications while making the users XP experience a virtual nightmare.
Microsoft asusmes they are untouchable which is a false sense of security on their part. They may laugh at the the overall market mumbers because of their OEM stranglehold. They haven’t learned their lesson yet. Redmond worships it’s IE because of the built in snoopability which translates into vulnerability and ignores the increasing numbers of Firefox, Opera and others with far more security and user freindliness.
While Redmond keeps getting tighter and tighter with buggy software the open source market keeps growing.
If Microsoft would pay more attention to its users experience instead of just it’s bottom line and capturing OEM vendors business we’d all be better off.