Ask Dave Taylor
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Most Popular
  • Top Categories
  • Books
  • About Dave
  • Ask Me
  • > Donate <
  • Home
  • HTML & Web Page Design
  • Can using tables hurt my Search Engine Results (SERPs)?

Can using tables hurt my Search Engine Results (SERPs)?

August 20, 2009 / Dave Taylor / HTML & Web Page Design, SEO & Marketing / 10 Comments

I can’t seem to get a straight answer when it comes to how a site is coded/built and the affects that this has on SEO. After having taken a few web courses (design to SEO related courses) it seems to me that the “best practice” with regard to building a site that is search engine “friendly” is with CSS, utilizing as few tables as possible. I’ve been told by numerous instructors that tables can adversely affect SEO rankings and they don’t recommend constructing with tables (they consider this an outdated approach).
However, I work with a couple of web developers that swear this isn’t true and refuse to move away from building sites with tables. Can you solve this mystery for me once and for all? And, if CSS is the way to go, should I go to the expense of having sites developed with tables converted to CSS in order to improve SEO??

Note: This was a “priority question”: by paying a small fee, Barb received an answer directly from me within 36 hours. Well worth it if it’s a question where you need to know the answer immediately, not weeks, or possibly even months down the road. Even better, it helps support our work here at Ask Dave Taylor too.

Thanks, Barb. You ask a great question!
I have never heard that tables can adversely affect your SEO placement (also known as your “SERPs”), and on the face of it, that doesn’t make sense anyway. As long as it’s legal HTML and properly formed, I can’t imagine it’s a problem. The definitive word for this sort of thing is always Google, and a quick check at their Webmaster Guidelines reveals nothing about tables being good or bad.
SEO Notepad says: “Today, the discussion has become more of an argument over whether using CSS is superior to using tables, and that is a debate that is largely a matter of taste and style.”
One author at Webmaster World had a good point too: “One advantage to table free design can be semantic. When you use tables for layout, groups of text on the page that are actually related visually and in meaning can end up widely separated in the html.”
What I will say, however, is that a pure-CSS site is problematic, because if you think about it, a page that’s encoded like:

<div class=”super-important-title”>My Important Key Words</div>

<div class=”regular-text”>This is stuff that’s not anywhere near as important</div>

How can the search engine figure out what are the most important words on the page if it doesn’t parse the CSS structure? Compare that to:

<h1 class=”super-important-title”>My Important Key Words</h1>

<p class=”regular-text”>This is stuff that’s not anywhere near as important</p>

Now you’ve given Google a lot more information to work with: The “h1” is a headline that is critically important to identifying the content of the page, while the text in the “p” block is just regular text.
Does that make sense? As a general rule, the search engines don’t parse and analyze CSS or Javascript, so designers who get too fancy with their layout code end up hurting you with search engine results, not helping, even if the site’s gorgeous.
Ultimately, though, the real keys to success are to produce great content with frequency that’s never shown up elsewhere online, to have good page titles that are specific to the content of that page, and to gain inbound links from related sites.

Let’s Stay In Touch!

Never miss a single article, review or tutorial here on AskDaveTaylor, sign up for my fun weekly newsletter!
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields
Correct invalid entries
No spam, ever. Promise. Powered by FeedBlitz
Please choose a color:
Starbucks coffee cup I do have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but first I'd like to say thank you, Dave, for all your helpful information by buying you a cup of coffee!

10 comments on “Can using tables hurt my Search Engine Results (SERPs)?”

  1. Ramesh says:
    January 8, 2015 at 1:42 am

    I have a lot of tables on my posts. Every time i check with SEO score, i am getting reports as “Nested tables”. So I am going to remove all of them and make it simple. However, I have seen on many websites that tables have been used. Even through ranked good in the Search engines? Any reason for that?

    Reply
  2. jim says:
    October 16, 2012 at 7:57 am

    Personally I think CSS and tables work just fine together. The important thing is moderation and using the tool as it’s intended. I’ve seen sites generate 25K worth of CSS code just to replace 5-6 lines of table code. Talk about ridiculous. And a week later I bet the end results are completely unintelligible, even to the original coder! I really had to laugh when someone told me that CSS3 RE-introduces table tags ala CSS tags. LoL Hey, folks, they’re all just tools. Use’em as you like but don’t rain on someone else’s parade ’cause they like different tools! Nuff said.

    Reply
  3. Scott says:
    October 30, 2011 at 3:25 am

    Google ranks table-based sites just as well as CSS-based sites.
    It’s the content that counts, and they do not care how the layout is achieved.
    Enough with the “tabular data” argument.
    There’s nothing wrong with using tables to create a basic 2 or 3-column layout.
    Additionally, not many designers nest tables more than 3 levels deep.
    Use whichever method you are comfortable with, and yields the desired effect.
    See Google’s video and bust the myth…
    http://morechristlike.com/which-is-more-seo-friendly-css-or-tables/

    Reply
  4. Nicholas Duncan says:
    September 9, 2009 at 5:20 am

    Oh yeah, and one last thing: Any web designer that builds a complete website in tables, doesn’t know how to use CSS properly.

    Reply
  5. Nicholas Duncan says:
    September 9, 2009 at 4:57 am

    Charles nailed it. Good comment. Thats exactly what tables are supposed to be used for – data.

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    August 24, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    I consider tables highly outdated. I think that tables should be used for what they were originally intended, tabular data. There are a lot of CSS snobs around who will insist that everything must be CSS, to the extent that they will make a complex set of classes to mimic a table. In my mind this is crazy.
    CSS is the way to go for layout as it tips the balance between content and structure back towards content, which we know google likes. But if you want to include a table of numerical data, by all means put a table in, it’s what they are there for afterall.

    Reply
  7. Maurice says:
    August 21, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Sorry Dave, but I think there are some issues that have to be separated. Without tables does not mean without structural tags like headings (h1 to h6, paragraphs (p) and lists (li). Or formatting (b, em, etc.) tags for that matter. Without tables just means don’t use the tag.
    And in my humble opinion it has some SEO advantages not to use tables in Webdesign.
    Maurice

    Reply
  8. Jack says:
    August 21, 2009 at 11:24 am

    I agree,
    In fact, if the html pages are a front end for a database driven set of pages those pages will return table based anyway.
    Jack

    Reply
  9. Dave Taylor says:
    August 21, 2009 at 10:41 am

    Sorry, but logic dictates that a search engine spider that’s reading through 400 words of actual content on a page needs to have some way of ascertaining which words are more important than others through a mechanism more accurate than keyword density. Ergo, it analyzes the markup that’s applied to the different words and phrases on the page.

    Reply
  10. JohnH says:
    August 21, 2009 at 10:22 am

    Hi Dave, I think that Jill Whalen would disagree with you about H1 tags. In a recent article at http://searchengineland.com/most-of-seo-is-just-a-boondoggle-22297 she said:
    “And don’t get me started on H1 tags. Old school SEOs swear by them, and often suggest if you don’t have keywords in them, your page is doomed. Yet, take them off a page and you’ll be hard pressed to see rankings or traffic changes from Google.”
    So who’s correct?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Recent Posts

  • How Can I Easily Create My Own Playlist on Spotify?
  • How Can I Prevent Remote Access to my Windows PC?
  • The Easy Way to Add Contacts to my New Android Phone?
  • How Can I Hide or Report An Offensive Advert on Facebook?
  • Switch “Paste” & “Paste and Match Style” Keyboard Shortcuts on MacOS?

On Our YouTube Channel

AUKEY Omnia 100W + Minima 20W Power Chargers -- DEMO & REVIEW

Roborock S6 MaxV Robot Vacuum Cleaner -- DEMO & REVIEW

Categories

  • AdSense, AdWords, and PPC Help (106)
  • Amazon Echo & Kindle Help (79)
  • Amazon, eBay, and Online Shopping Help, (157)
  • Android Help (160)
  • Apple Watch Help (49)
  • Articles, Tutorials, and Reviews (327)
  • Business Advice (192)
  • Computer & Internet Basics (721)
  • d) None of the Above (160)
  • Facebook Help (365)
  • Google, Chrome & Gmail Help (157)
  • HTML & Web Page Design (244)
  • Instagram Help (44)
  • iPad Help (137)
  • iPhone & iOS Help (571)
  • iPod & MP3 Player Help (173)
  • LinkedIn Help (79)
  • Linux Help (149)
  • Linux Shell Script Programming (86)
  • Mac & MacOS Help (833)
  • Most Popular (10)
  • Outlook & Office 365 Help (10)
  • PayPal Help (68)
  • Pinterest Help (53)
  • Reddit Help (12)
  • SEO & Marketing (80)
  • Spam, Scams & Security (84)
  • Trade Show News & Updates (23)
  • Twitter Help (212)
  • Video Game Tips (66)
  • Web Site Traffic Tips (62)
  • Windows 10 Help (831)
  • Wordpress Help (201)
  • Writing and Publishing (72)
  • YouTube Help (43)
  • YouTube Video Reviews (159)
  • Zoom, Skype & Video Chat Help (42)

Archives

Social Connections:

Ask Dave Taylor


Follow Me on Pinterest
Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on LinkedIn
Follow me on Instagram


AskDaveTaylor on Facebook



microsoft insider mvp


This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this site or on any linked site. Further, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to our terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site. Our lawyer says "Thanks for your cooperation."
© 2020 by Dave Taylor. "Ask Dave Taylor®" is a registered trademark of Intuitive Systems, LLC.
Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Accessibility Policy