Free tech support / small logo


Why don't journalists ever quote me?

Dave, I'm a book author and am baffled. I frequently get asked by journalists for my thoughts on specific matters, but while I respond within a week or so with long essays on what I think is the subject of the interview, very, very rarely am I quoted. What's up with that?


Dave's Answer:

To answer this, I turn to my colleague and fellow journalist Esther Schindler of Bitranch, who answers this question in general terms, but with some superb insight into how journalists work and how to maximize your chances of actually being quoted:

This question is a classic situation where it sounds like we have a journalist asking a book author for input on an article. There's a good chance that the journalist really wants to quote such an author, because it's always helpful to get an expert's view. (In my humble opinion, this is far better than quoting an "industry analyst"... but that's a tirade for another time.)

From the author's point of view, this is an opportunity for a BIG FAT PLUG for your book. I'm not sure that anybody will run out and buy a copy because you said something pithy, but it can't hurt and it certainly raises your visibility. Besides, in your next book proposal, you can cite the news articles in which you were quoted as a Big Name In Your Field.

So the reporter and the person being quoted both want this to work. However...

Most authors I communicate with don't provide one very specific bit of information that I always ask for: how shall I refer to you? Arguably, many of them are probably thinking that I already know them and thus shouldn't have to provide that info. Even if that were true, this is the author's opportunity to position himself in the manner he wants to be perceived. Sometimes you might want to be referred to as, "Joe, a QA manager at Big Company" (if you're trying to get glory for your company), another time you want to be "Joe, a senior consultant at Joe Inc." (if you want to get the income for yourself), or "Joe, author of "Joe's Secret Recipes for Brownies and Quality Software."

In logistical terms, by NOT providing the info to the reporter, you may be setting yourself up for not being quoted at all. (And since you presumably put some attention into writing your response, that'd be a bummer.) If I'm on deadline and I asked three experts to comment (in the hope that ONE of them would respond by 1:30pm), I may not have time to write back to you for the "how shall I refer to you?" query. (For Software Test & Performance that's rarely a problem, since I can usually follow up with that info after the copy editor is done smoothing my text, but you never know when I'll introduce you to an eWEEK reporter. I hang out with these guys.)

The short lesson here is to always provide a VERY short bio sentence for the reporter, even if it isn't requested. Oh, and be fast off the mark: the week you spend writing a long essay means that you probably completely missed my deadline. I'd rather have one paragraph within a few hours than twenty unquotable paragraphs a week later.

Never confuse an interview with a conversation.

This was a really hard lesson for me to learn on the reporter side of the table, and I suspect it's hard to learn as the interviewee, too. That's not to say that you can have a great discussion, and in fact the very best interviews demonstrate a real connection between the parties involved. But even in those cases, you should always keep in mind that -- unless this is "A Q&A with James Gosling," in which you're the star of the show -- the reporter will be looking for meaty bits that fit into the flow of the article being constructed.

That implies "sound bytes," and the situation isn't usually as dire as that. (Though I have, on occasion, spent more words introducing a speaker than quoting her.) The point is to be aware that the microphone is on, and that you're more likely to be quoted at length if you provide info that will help others, tell a story (as long as it's short or can be summarized... I cry every time I hear a wonderful anecdote that goes on for 200 words, when I can't cut it down), or in some way help the reader to do his job better. (Just as when you're writing a book, except we're looking at WORD count and not PAGE count.)

Don't be general. Always be specific.

Don't say only, "Use good coding." (duh) That's a topic sentence. You need to follow it up with an example. For instance [<-- see?], I just got a note back from an IT pro who said, "For instance theres no point in having an application that declares a string instance and a server variable then destroys it the minute it's no longer in use, just to have an SQL statement within a function that has to be submitted twice to the server just because he or she can't be bothered declaring all the column names within the table he is requesting from." That's long, convoluted, and there's probably someone who'll disagree with it... but it's specific.

Thanks a bunch for your informative response, Esther!









Subscribe!
Never miss another Q&A article! Click to subscribe: Add to Google Reader Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator RDF XML
Comments

Agree with yout advisor on most things.

A good journo will ask: "Can I have your correct name, in other words the one you preferred to be known as, along with your official position (if in a company) or how you like to be referred to (as in guru on whatever)?" Almost always the journo will need a spelling, so he'she should ask that too. If they don't then they're lazy. So you have to spoonfeed them.

Sense if they have a clue what you're on about. Everyone thinks they can be a journo if they're a good listener and able to quote verbatim. Rubbish. If it's clear you're on unfamiliar territory - ask if it makes sense to them. If not, explain. A great CMO at a tech company once had a tough story to sell - complicated, jargon laden etc. I said - "Look they won't get it. I'm struggling and I know this stuff. Talk in metaphors, similes, whatever but DON'T talk geek - not for my audience at least." Job done.

When it comes to interviews - know your topic inside out, be able to sum it up in 30 seconds in a bright, interesting and refreshing way. None of this: "We're the global leader in . . ." nonsense - instant death to any conversation. Think elevator pitch - problem>concept>solution - all in 30 seconds.

Most people that get interviewed have some media training - the trouble is most comes from the command and control school of ad/marketing/PR driven messaging. I know that and so I filter it out.

A good journo will ALWAYS engage the interviewee in a conversation, demonstrating a knowledge of the subject area. It's the best way to get the best quotes and beats the crap out of Q&A - which doesn't work unless you're prepared to move away from the script.

Some of the best pieces I've done never quoted to the formal questions - PRs scream - "Why didn't you refer to this or that thing he said?" Answer: "It's not your article, it's mine."

This is why forums, blogs etc are so powerful - they play by a different set of rules.

Oh yes - journos don't have time to read essays - they want fast, quotable stuff that reflect's your personality. So when a former CEO of Cognos said to me: "I'm really a rookie CEO, I'm not sure I know what I'm doing," guess what? That was the quote. Guess what - the PR was incandescant. Guess what - it was a great article.

Posted by: DA Howlett at September 7, 2005 6:01 PM

One other important thing: you are never off-the-record with a professional journalist. It's his/her job to put interesting things in print. So you never, ever want to say anything to a journalist which you don't want to see in print the next day.

Posted by: Josh at September 7, 2005 9:37 PM

Josh, you _can_ be off-the-record with a journalist. I've had plenty of conversations that never made it into print.

The trick, though, is to be really explicit about what is-and-isn't on the record. You also have to have some reason to trust this particular journalist and her credibility (i.e that the off-the-record comment will stay that way); that's not a problem with most name-brand publications, but I'd be more careful with a newbie.

It's easiest, though, if you simply don't say anything you'd hate to see in print. Because mistakes do happen. For instance, a friend of mine -- who used to be a journalist but went back to an IT career -- works in a field in which all the players know one another. Even though the journalist was careful not to identify the individual, when my buddy said, "We're using XYZ software for our anti-virus needs," he was _immediately_ identifiable... because everybody in that business knew that only THAT company had adopted that particular solution. The journalist, of course, couldn't have known it (he had only said, "...at a west coast provider of..."), but it didn't make my buddy feel better when he was called on the carpet.

Posted by: esther Schindler at September 8, 2005 6:13 PM

The real discussion should be why journalists don't quote more folks in corporate America not regardless of whether the person on the other end has written a book or not. Being a book author is secondary...

Posted by: James at September 19, 2005 3:11 AM

I have something to say, now that you mention it, but ...
Starbucks coffee cup I do have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but first I'd like to say thank you for all your efforts on this Web site by buying you a cup of coffee!

I do have a comment, now that you mention it!











Remember personal info?


Please note that I will never send you any unsolicited email. Ever.

While I'm at it, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to my terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.









Recent Entries


Search
I Need Help!
Need Help? Ask Dave Taylor!


© 2002 - 2012 by Dave Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

Note: This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

[whiteboard marker tray]
"Ask Dave Taylor®" is a registered trademark of Intuitive Systems, LLC.