|
|
What does "white hat" and 'black hat" mean?What do the marketing terms "white hat" and "black hat" mean, specifically? I know they have the connotations of "good" and "bad", but why? Thanks. These are commonly used marketing terms, as you know, and I am not positive where they originate, but I can make a very good guess. Go back to early Western movies and you'll see where this comes from: the characters that had white hats were invariably the good guys, and the characters with black hats were the bad guys. As film critic Roger Ebert notes in his review of the Western classic Shane: "Shane wears a white hat and Palance wears a black hat, but the buried psychology of this movie is a mottled, uneasy, fascinating gray." Or the more pretentious Premier review of The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada: "Three Burials is beautiful, authentic and brutally observant of human nature. With real Tex-Mex backdrops instead of the usual Monument Valley vistas and characters too complex to withstand simple white-hat/black-hat reductionism, Three Burials is a visionary portrait of the New West." Back to the computer world. Free software guru Richard Stallman, in his book Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software, notes: "The urge to confine the culture of computer hacking within the same ethical boundaries is well-meaning but impossible. Although most software hacks aspire to the same spirit of elegance and simplicity, the software medium offers less chance for reversibility. Dismantling a police cruiser is easy compared with dismantling an idea, especially an idea whose time has come. Hence the growing distinction between "black hat" and "white hat" -- i.e., hackers who turn new ideas toward destructive, malicious ends versus hackers who turn new ideas toward positive or, at the very least, informative ends." In the marketing and search engine optimization sense, "white hat" techniques are those that are legit, aboveboard, ethical and honest, while "black hat" techniques are also known as dirty tricks, using techniques that are typically banned or prohibited by vendors or service providers. Behind this all, however, is a troubling possibility that there's an element of racism involved with this nomenclature too. Why would "white" be good, positive and truthful, while "black" is bad, evil and unethical? Consider "white lies" as another example of this: hopefully that's not the etymological basis of this phrase, but it's something to think about when you talk about how you're a 'white hat marketer' or similar. Hope this definition proves helpful to you!
More Useful Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Articles:
✔ How do I restructure my Wordpress blog without losing SEO?
I have a wordpress blog that was using categories in the url structure like this: /category_name/post_name/ Then I had read somewhere that if...
✔ Change in Web site navigation drops PageRank to zero?We changed our website recently and also changed the menus on it so some of our pages have a different path now. For...
✔ How do I implement add rel=author for Google serps?I notice that sometimes on the Google search results that the author of the article is displayed next to the match in the...
✔ Add a new site to my Google Webmaster Tools account?Thanks for your earlier blog entry about how to verify my account with Google Webmaster Tools! Now I want to add an additional...
✔ How do I verify my site with Google Webmaster Tools?I've heard that one of the best ways to improve my Google search ranking is to fix anything that's marked as incorrect in...
Let's stay in touch!
Sign up for my weekly AskDaveTaylor Newsletter and you'll receive even more tech and gadget help
right to your inbox, along with exclusive news and industry updates. It's good stuff. I promise!
Categorized:
Search Engine Optimization (SEO)
(Article 6702,
Written by Dave Taylor)
Tagged: black hat, ethical marketing, seo techniques, white hat Previous: Does MySpace install spyware or adware on computers? Next: How do I set a Microsoft Word document to be exactly 25 lines per page? Reader Comments To Date: 1
I do have a comment, now that you mention it!Check This Out Too... |
Recent Entries
Look for Answers
Recommended
All Our Categories
Apple iPad Help
Articles and Reviews Auctions and Online Shopping Blogs and Blogging Building Web Site Traffic Business and Management Computer and Internet Basics d) None of the Above Facebook Help Google Gmail Help Google Plus Help HTML, JavaScript and Web Site Programming Industry News and Trade Shows iPhone and Cell Phone Help iPod, Sony PSP and MP3 Player Help Kindle Fire Help Mac OS X Help Pay Per Click (PPC) Advertising Pinterest Help Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Shell Script Programming Tech Support Video Help The Writing Business Twitter, LinkedIn and Social Network Help Unix and Linux Help Video Game Tips and Help Windows PC Help Find Me on Google+ ADT on G+ |
Most link building by most SEO firms is not "natural" and is in fact blackhat according to Google. If you have to pay for it, ask for it, comment for it or insert a link in your article to gain it, then you are manipulating Google search results and Google terms that as blackhat. You just need to view the many video's by Matt Cutts to realize that if you are doing any of the above, then you are creating links manually and violating Google's TOS.
It simply baffles me how many SEO experts will quickly denounce Cloaking as "unethical" or against Google's TOS or even label it as spam which manipulates search results but then on a daily basis create artificial, manual or software generated backlinks for clients.
If you are distributing countless articles with links or posting on blogs/forums to obtain backlinks or using automated backlinking software, isn't that also spamming to manipulate search engine results?
What is the difference? It all violates Google's TOS.
There is also a silly mindset that whitehat SEO is risk free and blackhat is full of risks. Really? How many whitehat sites, that supposedly conformed to all of Google's TOS, suddenly lose their ranking and all their business when Google decides to do a major algorithm update? Ha! Where is the reward for loyalty from Google?
So does "blackhat" or being "unethical" really exist anymore? Isn't this really about traffic, conversions and surviving within an ever tightening monopoly created by Google for which we now are left with few other options, unless to line the pockets of Google shareholders.