Industry guru Dave Taylor answers free tech support questions about a wide variety of business and technical topics, including blogging, Google AdSense, MySpace, Sony PSP, Apple iPod, Mp3 players, management, Linux, SEO, Mac OS X, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Microsoft Windows.

Can I use nofollow links internally to channel PageRank?

This is a rather geeky SEO question, but I have heard that Google considers internal site links as relevant as external links and that it's smart to "nofollow" links that go to pages you don't want or need ranked in the search engine. Is that true? More importantly, is it safe?


Dave's Answer:

&First off, credit where it is due: My friend and SEO wizard Leslie Rohde told me about using nofollow to channel and manage how PageRank flows on a site quite a while ago, and while I was skeptical and concerned it was "gray hat" SEO or worse, it turns out he was right and I was wrong. It's totally legitimate and acceptable and indeed Google blogger Matt Cutts recently came out and stated on SEOmoz that "webmasters can feel free to use nofollow internally to help tell Googlebot which pages they want to receive link juice from other pages."

His specific answer was more detailed, of course:

"The nofollow attribute is just a mechanism that gives webmasters the ability to modify PageRank flow at link-level granularity. Plenty of other mechanisms would also work (e.g. a link through a page that is robot.txt'ed out), but nofollow on individual links is simpler for some folks to use. There's no stigma to using nofollow, even on your own internal links; for Google, nofollow'ed links are dropped out of our link graph; we don't even use such links for discovery. By the way, the nofollow meta tag does that same thing, but at a page level."

This is pretty big news in the world of search engine optimization, actually, and I'm really glad you asked this question. For those of you who aren't steeped in SEO, you might recall that the idea of "nofollow" was to combat spammers who added bogus comments so that they would gain links from blogs to their own sites and thereby game the system. I've written about it here: penalized for nofollow links?

It worked pretty well as a solution, though other methods of combating blog comment spam have arisen that are far better (hat tip to the amazing Akismet system especially). Nonetheless, the idea that you could add links to your Web site that weren't seen (or at least ranked) by search engines is a powerful one and it's no surprise that people started to think through different uses.

Now let's look at my own weblog here. I have a lot of pages on this site, including pages that are present for my readers, but aren't pages I really need to have show up as a result on a Google search. An example? My ask a question page. By default, I'd link to it like this:

<a href="ask.html">ask a question</a>

but then since PageRank is transmitted to linked pages as a formula (PageRank value of any given link = PageRank of the current page / number of links), I really don't want to waste even a fractional PageRank on that page. Instead, therefore, I can do this:

<a href="ask.html" rel="nofollow">ask a question</a>

(I've highlighted the change to make it stand out, of course)

Now I'm in control of how that PageRank that I've earned for my individual pages is disseminated throughout the site, and that's a good thing. Leslie pegged it when he told me months ago that any secondary pages, anything like a sitemap, contact us, about us, or similar page should always be nofollowed. He's exactly right.

More importantly, with the recent information from Matt, we now can modify our pages with assurance that it isn't anything dangerous, isn't a technique that can get you into trouble with Google or otherwise backfire.

I hope that answers your question. My advice: go for it!



Help others find this article at Del.icio.us, Digg, Netscape, Reddit, and Simpy.

Subscribe!

Never miss another useful Q&A article again! Subscribe to AskDaveTaylor with Google Reader.

Comments

nofollow for site Map? i think you want google to spider your sitemap so it can index your pages.

I would take the nofollow off your sitemap

Posted by: ? at August 31, 2007 9:59 PM

Y'd think so, but modern sitemaps are found directly through a query for "sitemap.xml", and you don't need to explicitly link to it at all for Googlebot and similar spiders to find it. :-)

Posted by: Dave Taylor at August 31, 2007 11:00 PM

Matt Cutts in no way advises Webmasters to use nofollow on their own internal links, and as anyone who reads the comments on that blog post should have seen, he came back and told Rand that Rand's interpretation was too strong.

Matt in fact says that the average Webmaster should not be using nofollow on internal links.

I'll just flat out tell you that no one in the industry is in a position to do it successfully or wisely. Some people may think they know how to do it but they don't.

And you sure don't want to nofollow your HTML sitemap.

This has to be one of the dumbest ideas for SEOs to promote in a long, long time. You might as well take down your Web site if you're going to start nofollowing your own content.

Posted by: Michael Martinez at September 4, 2007 10:21 AM

The official claim is that links with the rel=nofollow attribute do not influence the search engine rankings of the target page. In addition to Google, Yahoo and MSN also support the rel=nofollow attribute.

i think it helps indexing

Posted by: John Illnes at April 10, 2008 1:04 AM

I have a lot to say, but ...
Starbucks coffee cup I have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but most of all I'd like to say thank you for all your efforts on this Web site by buying you a chai!

I do have a comment, now that you mention it!









Remember personal info?


Please note that I will never send you any unsolicited commercial email. Ever.

While I'm at it, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to my terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.









Search
Find just the answers you seek from among our 1700+ free tech support articles by using our Lijit search engine.


Help!





Subscribe to
Ask Dave Taylor!

Add to Google Reader
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

RDF   XML

Free Updates!
Sign up and get free weekly updates and special offers on books, seminars, workshops and more.


Recent Entries
Join the List!
Join my author info mailing list, where you'll learn about my upcoming books, speaking gigs, and more!


Book Links
© 2002 - 2008 by Dave Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

Note: This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

[whiteboard marker tray]