
Rules in Windows Outlook 2003 Don't Work?Dave, I recently upgraded from Outlook 2002 to Office 2003 and now my rules do not work. I have edited them, deleted them and re-entered the information but they just will not work. Any ideas? This is a tough one, but here's how Microsoft explains what to do when Outlook rules aren't working: After you upgrade to Outlook 2003 from Outlook 2000 IMO with multiple POP accounts, rules that are based on the through the specified account option might not work. To work around this problem, recreate the rules in Outlook 2003. To create a rule for POP accounts in Outlook 2003
Not a very desirable solution, but that's not uncommon from Microsoft in my experience. These steps were listed on this page that had things to consider before upgrading. Apparently this is result of code change. Outlook has a 32K character limit per account for *all* rules. In Outlook 2003 they made the rules take unicode characters effectively sawing your rules limit in half since unice takes two bytes per char. Thanks to Tommy Martin for his help
Help others find this article at Del.icio.us, Digg, Netscape, Reddit, and Simpy.
Categorized:
Windows Help
(Article 4002)
Tagged: Previous: Auto-updated Windows, now it crashes all the time? Next: Can I be penalized for NOFOLLOW links? Subscribe!
Never miss another useful Q&A article again! Subscribe to AskDaveTaylor with Google Reader. On the article above, what you have listed actually doesn't answer the question as it was asked. The person originating the question has already claimed to do what you've suggested he do, as have I. In the instance of NOT upgrading but in a new profile I have attempted to create new rules from scratch and they just simply do not work. I can't figure out why, other than in Outlook 2003 they just don't work if you aren't in the first original profile. I log into a Domain and I have multiple accounts. When I change out the server (DC, or beginning of the forest) and have to create a new profile, the new rules I create don't work as if they had not been created at all. What gives with this? I don't know but it's why I'm inclined to believe Microsoft has "crappy software". Posted by: Rico Criner at September 17, 2005 6:54 PMI think that MS needs to create an easy way for people to manage their rules in Outlook 2003. I have about 100 at the moment, more on the way. It is so hard to find the right rule to edit if you want to change one of them. Posted by: Andrew at October 3, 2005 7:23 PMDave, I have a similar but different problem. I have about 20 client side rules that worked great in Outlook 2000. I upgraded the client to Outlook 2003 they still worked great. Last night the server group upgraded and patched the exchange servers. Now the rules no longer work. However, if you go in and manually choose the rules to "run now" they will work. Isn't Microsoft fantastic? Posted by: Tom Piecuch at November 23, 2005 7:49 PMwas reading your thread on Outlook 2003 rules, some of mine worked in Outlook 2000 XP and some did not (new ones that I created NEVER worked). I have tried over and over again to recreate the rules using your method of the POP server and that did not work either. Any help would be greatly appreciated - or I may just switch e-mail clients as it quite apparent that MS CANNOT write code if their life depended on it. Between all the whols in XP and now Office is it worht the hassle any more?? Does anyone wonder why EVERYTHING WORKS in the Unux/Linux world?? Heck I have Unix machines at NASA that have not been re-booted in over ten years Any help would be appreciated or I am going to trash MS Office and go back to Word Perfect and find a another e-mail client Thanx Dave Dave Posted by: David Nugent at December 2, 2005 3:10 PMI have one rule, which is suppose to move mail from a particular email address to a folder. Basically the rule says if sender contains "cae" then move to folder "cae mail" This rule never works. I always have to "Run Rules Now" for the rule to actually do something. MS did a horrible job implementing the rules. I can't even create code to run the rules because Outlook doesn't expose the rules in the object model. its very frustrating! I too have random problems with rules in Microsoft email programs: my wife runs Entourage on the Mac and I have rules that if I "apply by hand" they work fine, but if I just leave them in the automatic rules list, never seem to be applied. Not exactly sure what to advise, however. Just buggy? Posted by: Dave Taylor at January 5, 2006 2:25 PMMy problem is double e-mail. I use one rule to move most e-mail to an "In box" in my .pst and other rules to sort specific e-mails into other folders in that .pst. The "In box" rule is set to run last but I still get copies of the e-mails in both the In-box and the appropriate folders. I did not set the condition to "move a copy" but the rules act as if I did. A real pain since I have to delete the extra copies all the time. Posted by: John Bowers at January 13, 2006 8:19 AMRules will also mysteriously stop working if you have another instance of Outlook running in the background (it tends to do this sometimes - you close Outlook but it stays in memory). You can check by making sure you have closed down all visible copies of Outlook and starting the task manager/task list (via CTRL-ALT-DEL on most versions of Windows) - if you see a process called OUTLOOK.EXE still running, that's your culprit - you can either end the process or (less brutal), restart Windows. When you get back into Outlook, remember to check whether any 'failed' rules have been disabled (unticked) before tearing your hair out again. Posted by: Nigel Kendrick at February 1, 2006 2:22 PMIn my Outlook 2003 installation rules are not working even if I recreate them from scratch. They worked well in Outlook 2000. Can someone help? Posted by: Zoltan at March 18, 2006 4:16 AMI recently upgraded to Outlook 2003 (running on an Exchange Server). All but one of my 25 original rules failed to convert without errors, so I deleted them all and started from scratch. However, I was only able to get them to work by manually running the rules. I tried something different today to work around this. Instead of trying to move emails to folders within my .pst (personal folders), I created a new folder that sits in the server mailbox. My rules actually move emails to that folder without me having to manually run them every time. This is only suitable for those emails I want to delete. (The server automatically deletes emails remaining on it after 60 days.) Well, I thought that did it, but I got in this morning and my rules didn't work again. I couldn't even run them manually anymore. All I did between yesterday and today was log off the PC and then log back in. So, this time I created a brand new .pst in the new format and moved all my mail from the old .pst into it. I went back to using the folder I created on the server for sorting out the junk. At least that works. Posted by: Jennifer at June 1, 2006 1:23 PMUnder outleook express it is possible to create rules using AND/OR operands. So A single rule can manage a message TO or FROM a contact. Inbound works automatically. Outbound needs to be manually run on the sent items folder. I am experiencing some problme with rules in Outlook 2003. I have two rules in running all the time. They meant to send out reply emails once the body contains certain words. Two different rules with two different triggers and two different reply message. However, if i use the same email account to send two emails that are meant to trigger off the two rules, only ONE would work. ie the first email got replied however, not the second email. WHY IS THAT?? Is there a way to create a rule, so that it: Example: I have been having strange problems with my Outlook rules as well - they have worked just fine through various upgrades, but suddenly they have stopped working. What's worse, if I create a new rule not only does it not work, I cannot subsequently edit the rule, deactivate it or delete it! These options are greyed out! This may fix the problem, Outlook 2003 often won't show corrupt rules, and they keep the visible rules from running. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924297/en-us Posted by: Paul Davis at October 23, 2006 10:05 AMI also had been facing the 'double email' problem as reported by 'John Bowers'. At least this can be sorted out. There is an option in 'action -items' while generating/ editing the rules. 'Stop processing more rules' Please enable this option for the rules at the top in the order. This will solve the problem of duplicate copy created when a rule move mail to a different folder Posted by: Yogi at October 24, 2006 11:00 PMYogi, THANK YOU! I had come to the conclusion a while back that I just had to live with the 'duplicate email' problem. I figured the "move to folder" actualy just COPIED to folder until all the rules were executed, THEN deleted the original. That 'Stop processing more rules' was EXACTLY what I was missing. Again, thank you so much! ----- I can't find help with my particular problem with 2003 rules. I create the rule to move messages from one account to a specific folder. We'll call it "account2." But when I select APPLY, the rule changes to move e-mail from "account1." I thought the link above would help, but I could not find "rules" when I ran MFCMAPI. Thanks. Posted by: Sid at January 18, 2007 8:06 PMI found I could fix the move problem which creates duplicates by checking 'then Delete' on the page where you also have "move to specified folder' selected. It made me nervous so I tested it out. Works great on my machine. If the email is moved to a folder when it comes THROUGH AN ACCOUNT I don't have this problem. I only have the doubled message issue when I am moving messages from that account subfolder AGAIN. I'm guessing the 'stop processing more rules' might work, but it makes me leary. I use over 20 different rules to sort my mail. I need ALL OF THEM TO RUN. I can't stop after the first one.. If this isnt' the way the 'stop processing more rules' actually works, please let me know. If it Doesn't work that way, its an awfully confusing name. Posted by: oldfogey at January 23, 2007 7:56 AMHeres a similar yet different problem. Im on a 2003-sbs enviornment with exchange. All use winxp-pro boxes and current updates. Out of the blue every machine stopped auo-running rules when outlook 2003 opens. Each user can manually run rules 10-20 with no issues. All rules are local. No server based rules in play. Any thoughts? Posted by: Jason at January 23, 2007 3:13 PMThis post above solved my problem. I have Outlook running on two computers and killing them both fixed the issue. I had tried that before, but MS programs have an excruciatingly obnoxious tendency to remain running in the background and I did not realize Outlook did this as well. Killing it with a CTRL-ALT-DEL was necessary. "Rules will also mysteriously stop working if you have another instance of Outlook running in the background (it tends to do this sometimes - you close Outlook but it stays in memory). You can check by making sure you have closed down all visible copies of Outlook and starting the task manager/task list (via CTRL-ALT-DEL on most versions of Windows) - if you see a process called OUTLOOK.EXE still running, that's your culprit - you can either end the process or (less brutal), restart Windows. When you get back into Outlook, remember to check whether any 'failed' rules have been disabled (unticked) before tearing your hair out again." Posted by: G at January 31, 2007 11:15 AMI am using Auto-Mate to get around the rule limitation of 32K. Here's my two cents: I have several rules set up as well, they have all been working fine, even through upgrades. I am using 2003 now and have for a long time. For some reason, NONE of my rules work anymore. They used to ALL work up until about a couple days ago. Now I too have to manually put a check mark in each and every rules box to manually "Run Rules Now". I spoke with our Exchange admin and there have not been any changes made on the network. So why did they stop, and how the he** do I get them running on their own again!!?? Posted by: Steven G at February 12, 2007 8:36 AMI have a outlook 2003 open to a mailbox in exchange 2003. I have have created couple rules to move undeliverable message to a subfolder. If I manually run the rules, it work. But rule will not work automatically unless manually run them. Please help. I found out my problem: In Outlook 03 there is a limit on how many rules you can have. I apparently reached and exceeded my limit, therefor NONE of them would work until I deleted some, which was ok because some were very old. Posted by: Steven G at March 12, 2007 10:34 AMI may have found a work around for the rules not running in MS Office Outlook 2007. I turned off Cached Exchange Mode and they have started working. Search Outlook Help for Cached Exchange Mode and you should fine the help page of how to get there. Steps are: It's been working for the past hour so we'll see if it keeps working tomorrow morning after a full reboot. Posted by: BobW at March 12, 2007 12:20 PMI fixed this very problem. So there is a workaround or a solution. 1/ Workaround: Disable Cached Mode.. Disable Cached Mode After doing all of this, my rules worked a treat!! Awesome! Posted by: Gary at March 20, 2007 8:27 AMArrgh! Nigel, thank you so much. Woooooo! Posted by: Dana Chapman at March 21, 2007 8:47 PMhi I using outlook 2003 when i set rules it shows it is deactivated because no space in server.when creating rules in my machine ..do the need ful... Regards Hello, My exchange server 2003 works but ever so often i cannot send or recieve e-mails. I will have to do a reboot for it to work again. Any ideas why this is so? I am running WIndows 2003 Enterprise Edition on DELL PE 2950 - 4 GB RAM Posted by: Stephen Mangal at April 5, 2007 6:11 AMI had a variation of this same problem with Outlook: Rules would work when I first started up Outlook, but if I left Outlook running, the rules would begin failing within a day or so. Turns out the problem was iTunes! iTunes is using the Outlook COM interface (a special software connection to Outlook) to retrieve my calendar when it syncs my iPod. Apparently, Apple has a bug in their code and it causes this rules failure in Outlook. The solution is to disable this COM connection. Here's how: 1. In iTunes, click on your iPod, then go to the Contacts page and clear the checkboxes for syncing contacts and calendars from Microsoft Outlook. 2. In Outlook, go to Tools -> Options -> Other -> Advanced Options -> COM Add-Ins, then clear the checkbox next to the iTunes Outlook Addin. Click OK several times to get back out, then restart Outlook. You will lose the ability to look at your calendar on your iPod, but at least Outlook will work properly again. (And obviously, if iTunes can screw up the Outlook rules, so could anything else that uses the COM Add-in interface.) Regards, My rules stopped working in Outlook. Ultimately I found this to be the resolution: * Rules live in your .PST (or .OST) file * If the data file becomes corrupt, it will fail * Run SCANPST.EXE/SCANOST.EXE (C:\Program Files\Common Files\System\MSMAPI\1033) * This will correct the problems in the file * Rules work now This corrected my problem. The program asks you to close Outlook. I did but something was still running. I had to terminate the OUTLOOK.EXE process. All went well after the repairs. Good Luck, I'm receiving multiple copies of same email using outlook express 2003, is there any solution for this problem. Posted by: Imran Shakir at April 25, 2007 12:24 AMIF y get multiple copies of the same mail due to ruels, add "stop proccessing more ruels". Posted by: Blackboy at April 25, 2007 12:41 PMAhhh thanks Nigel Life saver, closed outlook 2003 and saw the other outlook.exe running in memory, killed it opened up outlook again, hey presto! Thanks Posted by: Heepo at May 11, 2007 3:31 AMGreetings, Came across this site while searching for outlook and problems :) My problem is slightly weird (is there any other kind?): For one domain, and one domain only, when I ever I send an email to an address @ that domain, outlook (2003) NEVER uses the default account and uses the LAST account listed in the email accounts list. Not sure if someone had seen this behaviour before. Any input would be greatly appreciated. I have multiple rules defined to save email into folders based on account. No rules for sending are defined. Thanks... Hosam Posted by: Hosam at May 12, 2007 6:00 PMI used to use my iPod for appointments etc. from my outlook calenders. Immediately after an automatic update to iTunes 7... my calender won't work in my iPod anymore. Any suggestions? The Calender folder on my iPod has no files in it at all. In outlook, the iTunes addin checkbox is checked. Thanks, Gwen Posted by: gwen at May 13, 2007 3:49 PMDear Dave, I'm using Microsoft Outlook 2003 and facing strange problem like in past I was receiving When I sort my emails in INBOX there mails comes seperately few mails under muni subfolder and few under mkjha folder. is there any way where I can I put both subfolders's mails together with other old mails too. Regards
Hi, Quite different problem, my Outlook rules work and not the way I want it to. I can see that working perfectly ok if I run it with Run Now option manually. That is one reason why I may not dig deep into my conditions of each rule. I may have to live with it as I do not have the option to switch to other email client. Thanks MS for this problem. Regards, i am getting duplicat emails in outlook 2003 and 2007.what is the solution for this. Posted by: ashwani at June 4, 2007 12:35 AMMy problen is similar, Outlook copies mails instead of moving them to a certain folder. Besides somes rules doesn't work at all. I used to work with outlook express, and i really miss its simplicity. Posted by: Fran at June 7, 2007 6:35 AMHelp! My pc crashed and i had to install windows... I have imported my pst file but i can't find the location where my outlook rules are stored. How can i get my rulez back Posted by: Robert-Jan at July 20, 2007 4:33 AMI have tried processing the stop rule for duplicate email moves but it doesn't work any suggestions? Posted by: Joanne Eames at August 14, 2007 4:39 AMI had a rule that is supposed to move the email from 1 specific sender to a specific folder. What it did was copy the email to the specific folder. To fix this I had to set the rule to delete as the last option. Posted by: Joe H at January 4, 2008 9:22 PMHi all! I found in Junk e-mail Options - Blocked senders a lot of blocked needed senders. Maybe this helps someone All, Regarding rules that are not running automatically, I had this exact same problem after I reformated my computer and recopied my backed-up.PST files to the default location (%userprofile%\local settings\application data\microsoft\outlook) and imported my old rules via the rules wizard. I fixed the problem by goign through each rule and selecting "on this machine only." For some reason, Outlook thought the newly imported rules should not apply to this computer because reformatting tricked it into thinking that it was now on a new computer. Regarding the duplicate e-mails, the situation may occur when your Outlook is configured as following: a) you use multiple .PST files, i.e. any amount that exceeds the default b) you propagated these .PST files via rules c) you are using a manually-created "Inbox" folder you as your in the default .PST e-mail delivery folder, and you set a rule to move e-mails from the default Inbox to your manually-created Inbox. There are two possible solutions to this problem: 1) Just use the default inbox in the .PST where e-mail is delivered, running rules as they arrive to this location, while deleting the rule you created to move e-mails to an inbox that you manually created for specific use with the .PST where e-mail is delivered. 2)Create an "intermediary" .PST file (recommended) whose purpose is strictly to function as the default delivery .PST where rules are processed. This is also a good configuration for security but that is a whole other issue. I hope this helps solve all or at least part of the problems described above. Posted by: Paul Campochiaro at February 28, 2008 1:59 PMI have set up several rules for messages sent to me by sites just like this one. The rule generally looks at the From: or Subject: line and moves the email to a personal folder used to store them until I get around to reading it. However, for the past year or so, I have found that an increasing number of emails are being moved without the body of the email. The To:/From:/Subject: data seems to be intact, but no message body. All rules worked in the beginning and some still work ... sometimes. Any thoughts on this revolting development? Glenn Posted by: Glenn Pettiet at March 17, 2008 10:19 AMhi there, i'm facing a weired rule problem. I've a blackberry and i want to recv a copy of my office id(exchange) in my blackberry. i configured that from the server but it goes directly to blackberry. later on i set a rule in outlook.But tech persons in 3G telphone company told me it will only work for POP3 acct.So i've created a rule to forward it to his gmail id set the rule to forward mail to gmail. Now the problem is the rule is not working. if i set any other office id in the rule, it works fine. but not to gmail or yahoo. Is this bcoz any security settings? Pls advise. While the Outlook rules don't work as usual with Zimbra... You can post macros/scripts that run off of the Outlook Application "Application_NewMailEx" event If you are handy with VBA you can mimic the rules and still get the old versatility of Outlook...and then some Posted by: David Thompson at July 1, 2008 5:28 PMIs it possible to setup an outlook rule to move folders? I have a list of folders that are created each day and then moved offline. Is it possible to setup a rule to auto copy sub folders moved to a top level folder to a second folder? For the last couple of weeks I am being told that when someone receives and email from me they are getting multiple copies of it. Some has had 103 of the same email. What has changed on my outlook to cause this. Posted by: Tammy at July 27, 2008 10:08 AMI had problems with the outlook 2007 not running automatically. I tried almost everthing...yet the only fix turned out to be removing/deleting the current profile created on the workstation and adding a new one. This forced the outlook client to rebuild and re-establish connection with the mail server (exchange) etc... Posted by: demy at July 28, 2008 6:34 AMI have a lot to say, but ...
I do have a comment, now that you mention it!
|
![]() Join Me At:
Search
Find just the answers you seek from among our 1700+ free tech support articles by using our Lijit search engine.
Help!
Subscribe to
Ask Dave Taylor!
Free Updates!
Sign up and get free weekly updates and special offers on books, seminars, workshops and more.
Articles and Reviews
Auctions and Online Shopping Blogs and RSS Feeds Building Web site traffic Business and Management Cell Phones and Mobile Phones CGI Scripts and Web Site Programming Computer and Internet Basics d) None of the Above HTML and CSS Mac OS X Help MySpace, Facebook, Twitter and Social Network Help Pay Per Click (PPC) Search Engine Optimization Shell Script Programming Sony PSP, MP3 Players, Etc. The Writing Business Unix and Linux Help Video Game Tips and Help Windows Help
Recent Entries
Join the List!
Book Links
|