Industry guru Dave Taylor answers free tech support questions about a wide variety of business and technical topics, including blogging, Google AdSense, MySpace, Sony PSP, Apple iPod, Mp3 players, management, Linux, SEO, Mac OS X, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Microsoft Windows.

Is "Prince Caspian" book 2 or book 4 in the Chronicles of Narnia?

I was browsing the juvenile fiction area of the public library earlier today and was pretty confused to see copies of The Chronicles of Narnia's book "Prince Caspian" (the basis of the upcoming movie of the same name) listed both as book #2 and book #4 of the series. What the heck? Which is correct?


Dave's Answer:

I noticed the very same thing when I went to read the book on which the new movie The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian is based: is it really the second book in the series after The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, or not?

In fact, is The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe the first book in the series?

To unravel this interesting question, it's important to go back to the original intent of author C.S.Lewis, who wrote the seven books of the Narnia series out of order in terms of the storyline or, as Narnia fans call it, in terms of Narnian history.

That is, if you look at the seven books in the order they were written, the lineup is like this:

• The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
• Prince Caspian
• The Voyage of the "Dawn Treader"
• The Silver Chair
• The Horse and his Boy
• The Magician's Nephew
• The Last Battle

That's how the movies are proceeding too: Prince Caspian is the second movie in the series.

If you look at the chronological sequence of the storyline, however, everything becomes quite different:

• The Magician's Nephew
• The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
• The Horse and his Boy
• Prince Caspian
• The Voyage of the "Dawn Treader"
• The Silver Chair
• The Last Battle: A Story for Children

If you're thinking that this is confusing, you're right! It's an unusual situation where the author fills in the storyline as the series becomes more popular, and it's why some of the editions of the Chronicles of Narnia list "Prince Caspian" as the second book, while others list it as the fourth.

In the late 1950's a boy wrote to author C. S Lewis to ask about what order the books should be read. The boy explained that his mother felt the books should be read in the order of their publication, but the boy preferred to read them in the order of where the stories took place in Narnian history, beginning with The Magician's Nephew.

C. S. Lewis wrote back, saying, "I think I agree with your order for reading the books more than with your mother's." It wasn't long after that publishers began to number the Narnia books in this way. But Lewis, who admitted to writing bits and pieces of the books at different times, also noted that the order probably didn't really much matter: "I'm not even sure that all the [books] were written in the same order in which they were published."

Personally, I'm reading them in the order that they were written, and am three books into the series. Those three books are The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, then Prince Caspian then The Voyage of the "Dawn Treader". Though I understand Disney wants to produce all of the books a la Lord of the Rings (and, coincidentally, Rings author J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis were good friends), which is expanding into a five film series, the book about the Dawn Treader is far more interesting and exciting than Prince Caspian.

References: CS Lewis Institute: Annotated Bibliography, Disney's "Prince Caspian" movie site and factmonster: Narnia.




Subscribe!

Never miss another useful Q&A article again! Subscribe to AskDaveTaylor with Google Reader.

Comments

Narnia fans can get pretty heated about the "correct" order. My personal preference is the published order as I think the events that unfold in "The Magician's Nephew" are a lot cooler when you already have something to link them to. I had a lot of Aha! moments reading that book.

Posted by: Dustin L. at May 7, 2008 9:57 AM

Unlike the Lord of the Rings, the Chronicles of Narnia can be read in just about any order and still make sense. They stand alone much better than LotR.

I haven't read the books since I was a child, and I don't expect that I will reread them until I have children old enough to understand them. I remember enjoying the stories, though.

Posted by: Blaine Moore at May 7, 2008 10:09 AM

I have a lot to say, but ...
Starbucks coffee cup I have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but most of all I'd like to say thank you for all your efforts on this Web site by buying you a chai!

I do have a comment, now that you mention it!









Remember personal info?


Please note that I will never send you any unsolicited commercial email. Ever.

While I'm at it, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to my terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.









Search
Find just the answers you seek from among our 1700+ free tech support articles by using our Lijit search engine.


Help!





Subscribe to
Ask Dave Taylor!

Add to Google Reader
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

RDF   XML

Free Updates!
Sign up and get free weekly updates and special offers on books, seminars, workshops and more.


Recent Entries
Join the List!
Join my author info mailing list, where you'll learn about my upcoming books, speaking gigs, and more!


Book Links
© 2002 - 2008 by Dave Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

Note: This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

[whiteboard marker tray]