Free tech support / small logo


Can I have images adjacent to my Google AdSense ads?

I have been to a couple of Web sites lately that have put images immediately next to their AdSense blocks and when I talked to the Webmasters, they said that adding the seemingly related images significantly increased their clickthru rate. But I dunno. Is it legal and within the AdSense terms of service?


Dave's Answer:

Until very recently, Google didn't explicitly state whether or not you could put graphics adjacent to an AdSense block, though it's always been clear that you can't bring undue attention to the advertising. You can say "Advertisement" above the block, for example, but you aren't supposed to say "Sponsor" because it implies a relationship with the advertiser, and an implicit endorsement of your site by those advertisers, that just isn't true.

In terms of the adjacent images, I've seen these for a long time and have always disliked them because I do think that it's an attempt to trick the reader, who quite logically assumes that the photos or pictures are somehow from the advertiser.

Here's a pretty benign example of how you can have images adjacent to an AdSense block that I cobbled together:

AdSense Block with Adjacent Images. Verboten!

In this example, the images are banal, but imagine if the ads were about automotive parts and the photos were of different exotic racecars (I've seen a site that did that) or were about celebrities and there were little celebrity photos adjacent to the adverts (seen that too).

The question is: is it acceptable to Google?

The answer is absolutely not.

As explained in the AdSense blog:

"We ask that publishers not line up images and ads in a way that suggests a relationship between the images and the ads. If your visitors believe that the images and the ads are directly associated, or that the advertiser is offering the exact item found in the neighboring image, they may click the ad expecting to find something that isn't actually being offered. That's not a good experience for users or advertisers."

There's an additional clarification that applies to some of my colleagues who have directories of Flash and other highly graphical content: "Publishers should also be careful to avoid similar implementations that people could find misleading. For instance, if your site contains a directory of Flash games, you should not format the ads to mimic the game descriptions."

I hope that clearly answers your question. But really, this is just common sense: if people can't differentiate between ads and content, then aren't you trying to trick them into clicking on the ads as if they're just part of your site navigation? And that being the case, surely you would agree that this is definitely not a service to the advertisers, who are not getting any sort of valid leads from their ad, just people who then complain that they didn't want to go there and click the BACK button before the page even finishes rendering.









Subscribe!
Never miss another Q&A article! Click to subscribe: Add to Google Reader Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator RDF XML
Comments

I have had that same question and have been meaning to check with google on the matter. While it is tempting to create ads that would essentially "trick" the user into clicking on the ad to create more revenue for yourself. It is really creating a diservice to the advertisers and in the long run could really hurt adsence on a whole.

The ads that are serviced have been written and tested by the individual advertisers and it is not up the adsence publisher to persuade potentially invalid clicks with images. So thanks Dave for posting such a great response.

Posted by: SteveC at December 23, 2006 4:31 PM

I'm glad someone asked. I had considered using this tactic until I read this article. Keep up the good work, Dave!

Posted by: DW at January 5, 2007 8:40 PM

I had a guide for setting up the html tables to for all the Adsense formats. It covered how to manipulate the image and set up for all adsense formats. Oh well, I guess that report is now useless in the wake of this new Google change.

Although this is best for the whole Adsense lifespan.

Posted by: Dave at January 7, 2007 10:55 AM

I have something to say, now that you mention it, but ...
Starbucks coffee cup I do have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but first I'd like to say thank you for all your efforts on this Web site by buying you a cup of coffee!

I do have a comment, now that you mention it!











Remember personal info?


Please note that I will never send you any unsolicited email. Ever.

While I'm at it, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to my terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.









Recent Entries


Search
I Need Help!
Need Help? Ask Dave Taylor!


© 2002 - 2012 by Dave Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

Note: This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

[whiteboard marker tray]
"Ask Dave Taylor®" is a registered trademark of Intuitive Systems, LLC.