Free tech support / small logo


How do Unix / Linux "hard links" work?

A reader writes:
So, I'm partway through your book, and I want to check on hard links. When you say it creates another door to the same body of data, is that literally true? For example, if all I have in my ./Documents directory is 001.doc (size 512K), and I hard link as hardlink.doc then run ls, do I see A or B?

A) 001.doc 512K
hardlink.doc 512K
total 1024K

B) 001.doc 512K
hardlink.doc 512K
total 512K

If it's not B, I'm not sure what the point is, other than maybe not changing the timestamp.


Dave's Answer: An interesting question! The main point of hardlinks is to allow a single data entity to be shared by multiple entries in the file system. If I saved this posting as "001.html" on my server, then created a hard link to the same file from "002.html", then I could subsequently delete "001.html" and "002.html" would be unaffected, with the same contents within. It's only when all links to a data entity are removed that the data gets hooked into the free list and is essentially recycled for later reuse.

In terms of your specific question, the system will view the two files as having separate content. This can be demonstrated thusly:

$ du 
249     .
$ ls -l
total 248
-rw-r--r--  1 dtint  vuser  247034 Aug 24 03:24 some.data

Now let's create some hard links. Notice "ls" reports 248 blocks in this directory

$ ln some.data link2
$ ln some.data link3
$ ln some.data link4
$ ls -l
total 992
-rw-r--r--  4 dtint  vuser  247034 Aug 24 03:24 link2
-rw-r--r--  4 dtint  vuser  247034 Aug 24 03:24 link3
-rw-r--r--  4 dtint  vuser  247034 Aug 24 03:24 link4
-rw-r--r--  4 dtint  vuser  247034 Aug 24 03:24 some.data

As expected, "ls" now reports 992 blocks in use, seeing each of the new hard linked 
files as new data. But... notice what "du" reports, since it actually looks deeper into 
the file system:

$ du 
249     .
As you can see, some elements of the file system see hard links as new and separate data entities (e.g. "ls"), while others dig further into the file system to ascertain actual data blocks used and associated with the current location (e.g., "du"). This makes sense because otherwise if you had lots of hard links you could theoretically end up in a situation where you have greater than 100% disk space utilization, which would clearly be a bit confusing at best!







Subscribe!
Never miss another Q&A article! Click to subscribe: Add to Google Reader Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe in NewsGator RDF XML
Comments

Another way to look at hard links - they share the same inode no matter what. Do this with ls -i and it will become obvious. The disadvantage of hard links is that you cannot hard link across 2 separate drives on your system ... say hda and hdb (when you can with soft or symlinks)
kjteoh

Posted by: kjteoh at June 17, 2005 12:00 PM

the information was very use full.
Thanks !!

please post some on cron jobs. Thanks in advance

Posted by: anjan at May 22, 2009 5:28 AM

I just tested hardlinks on an NFS share, and it worked! .. i knew that symbolic links didn't work on NFS so i tried hard links and it worked

that leads me to believe you can also hard link between different harddrives or can anyone explain why it wouldn't work?

Posted by: Azeem at June 24, 2009 9:23 PM

I have something to say, now that you mention it, but ...
Starbucks coffee cup I do have a lot to say, and questions of my own for that matter, but first I'd like to say thank you for all your efforts on this Web site by buying you a cup of coffee!

I do have a comment, now that you mention it!











Remember personal info?


Please note that I will never send you any unsolicited email. Ever.

While I'm at it, please note that by submitting a question or comment you're agreeing to my terms of service, which are: you relinquish any subsequent rights of ownership to your material by submitting it on this site.









Recent Entries


Search
I Need Help!
Need Help? Ask Dave Taylor!

Linux Journal: Free Issue!


© 2002 - 2012 by Dave Taylor. All Rights Reserved.

Note: This web site is for the purpose of disseminating information for educational purposes, free of charge, for the benefit of all visitors. We take great care to provide quality information. However, we do not guarantee, and accept no legal liability whatsoever arising from or connected to, the accuracy, reliability, currency or completeness of any material contained on this web site or on any linked site.

[whiteboard marker tray]
"Ask Dave Taylor®" is a registered trademark of Intuitive Systems, LLC.